Eugene Forsey Liberal

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Yeats, Dion, Iggy &...Liberals?

The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity. Observing fellow Liberals furiously contradict themselves on Iggy is dispiriting. When I read this, Spector's & Gardner's insightful comments made me think of another piece, I (Dion) am more Liberal than you and Dion's point: "Ignatieff didn't just support George W. Bush's adventures; on more than one occasion, "He was pushing Bush in the back."" Were I to be bothered to review Liberal blogs & commentary from the majority who neither supported Iggy for the 2006 leadership nor he & his supporters' subsequent machinations, I wonder whether I might find they consistently made many of the same points as the Cons are now? Poser la question, c'est y répondre, non?

Moral: this is what happens when Liberals renounce liberalism and have a "coup de chefferie tranquille", installing a leader whose core positions, in his field of supposed expertise, are contrary to established Liberal (& liberal) traditions.

13 Comments:

  • At 6:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Yawn.....get over it will you? Grow up - no one is listening to you, the cry baby.

     
  • At 7:11 PM, Blogger Eugene Forsey Liberal said…

    Dear Anon,
    you rather make my point, eh?

     
  • At 7:25 PM, Anonymous Arturo said…

    Actually, you make the point with each successive boring tirade against Ignatieff.

    Quit the party would you. And yes, grow the fuck up you whiny child.

    Clueless.

     
  • At 7:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Wow, all hail Iggy the Ignorant.... by ignorant....


    There is little difference between liberals and connies...

     
  • At 8:00 PM, Blogger Quixotique said…

    Actually, Artuto (the dumb ass you claim to be), to use your term and Anon, EFL is the grown up in this discussion. Party associates - and their leaders - who accept and follow blindly, are little more than supplicants, not adherents to a party philosophy or tradition.

    Ignatieff is proving himself to be a decent leader, and as he and his more rampant supporters like to point out a good listener. Why would you automatically assume that he (Ignatieff) would be opposed to hearing and/or debating (both healthy things in a democracy/democratic institution) EFL's pov?

    Why should EFL "quit" the party because it has a new leader that EFL would like to infulence/hear him? It's his party. Because a new CEO is in charge, doesn't make ir less so, nor his opinion less valid.

    You have blithely pointed out what's amiss in Canadian politics today.

     
  • At 8:00 PM, Blogger Eugene Forsey Liberal said…

    Dear Arturo,
    you also make my point in delectable troglodytic fashion.

    Thanks,

    EFL

     
  • At 8:03 PM, Blogger Eugene Forsey Liberal said…

    Q & CWTF,

    Cheers.

     
  • At 8:09 PM, Blogger Quixotique said…

    Back

     
  • At 8:19 PM, Anonymous Liz said…

    Eugene is 100% right - I am a Liberal and find Iggy's history dispicable ... Eugene is only raising valid points, and he has a right to do so.

     
  • At 8:24 PM, Blogger Eugene Forsey Liberal said…

    Cheers Liz.

     
  • At 11:29 PM, Blogger James Curran said…

    JUST CHECKING IN TO SEE IF EVERYONE'S OK. CARRY ON. ;-)

     
  • At 12:12 AM, Anonymous CautionaryLib said…

    Iggy's an interesting person. I'm still not entirely sure I even like him. Some things endear him to me, others? Make me want to run screaming.

    And I can't quite commit to the idea of him as a longterm leader, which will probably get me pummeled by other Liberals. If anything, he'll get a minority, if that.

    It's a love/hate relationship with Iggy.

    I wonder if this is how Conservatives feel with Harper?

     
  • At 10:14 PM, Blogger Eugene Forsey Liberal said…

    JC:)

    CL: Intriguing.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home