Good News - Doctor/Specialist I'd Recommend
"Ignatieff said his Liberals must propose a democratic reform package to ensure that "I'm not going to shut down Parliament when the heat's on...every time my government is under legitimate scrutiny."" - Good news. Now if only there was someone in caucus who was qualified to bring such a package together, in a coherent whole. I'm imagining, like, one of Canada's and the world's leading experts on public administration, federalism & intergovernmental relations, and had served as a minister for years in a cross-cutting job that required knowledge of the running of all departments, while being sensitive to federal & intergovernmental implications, and who had been PM's right hand man, on all biggest cabinet committees, and in the know on view from the top, and had also had experience as backbench government MP, and had also seen the world from the perspective of a line minister, trying to push a total government response to the biggest issue imaginable against structural obstacles, and who had seen the world as humble opposition MP, and as critic, and as leader of an opposition caucus, as insider & outsider. A guy like that might have a few useful ideas, eh? And also know how to separate the wheat from the chaff, knowing that while general thrust of Gomery was well-intentioned, some (many?) of Gomery's recommendations were counter-productive and silly, and other areas of concern forgotten. A guy, who because he was born into discussion of these questions, and became world leading specialist in them, and that had great practical experience, has a massive institutional memory. It would need someone with a sharp mind and a natural inclination to analysis that led to coherent, structural, workable, useful reforms that make the world a better place. If only. Thinking, thinking....umm, paging Dr. Dion. Of course, to be fair, there's probably not a public policy related question on Earth for which one couldn't say that Dion was best if one wanted a productive coherent reality-based solution. But democratic & administrative reform, improving the very matrix of our system, to fundamentally, structurally, alter our system for the better, for a long time? Yeah, he just might be the man for the job. Just. Barely. By the slightest bit. And by slightest I mean of course the distance between Earth & Jupiter.


3 Comments:
At 11:50 AM,
KC said…
"Ignatieff said his Liberals must propose a democratic reform package to ensure that "I'm not going to shut down Parliament when the heat's on...every time my government is under legitimate scrutiny."
Not only do I not believe him (every opposition party talks about democratic reform while in opposition) but what an arrogant weasel! What makes him think Canadian's are going to let him form government? A few positive poll results are hardly cause for celebration. We've seen the Liberals go up only to tumble down again.
At 12:17 PM,
Loraine Lamontagne said…
Wow KC - I have never read such a silly comment.
How loudly were you complaining about Stephen Harper's arrogance at proposing an electoral program, including a fixed elections date law? What made Harper think Canadians could let him form government before the results were in?
At 7:36 PM,
KC said…
I love how everyone assumes that if you don't like Michael Ignatieff you must like Stephen Harper... silly assumption.
I protest when politicians get ahead of themselves by talking about "my government" and talking about 'when' rather than 'if' they take power--especially when they have a well known history of arrogance a la Michael Ignatieff.
Post a Comment
<< Home