Iggy & Oilsands - Are We Libs Down With This?
It's one thing to go trolling for votes in Alberta. It's another to become the Alberta Suns' new best friend. So the National Geographic expose leads to "Ignatieff is positioning himself as a staunch defender of the Alberta oilsands. He’s brushing aside a 20-page spread in National Geographic magazine that outlines environmental concerns around the northern Alberta industry. He says the oilsands need to be made more sustainable, but he’s proud of the industry and called it a world leader. That’s a switch from previous Liberal policy that suggested Canada should stop subsidizing the oilsands and focus on alternative sources of fuel."
To review: We're now in bed with Pablo & his nationalist friends. And NF&L MPs can ignore 3-line whip votes to appease provincial sensitivities. And the Oil Sands are A-OK. And we're happy to stay in Afghanistan as long as the USA wants us there (oh, it'll become "humanitarian work" that happens to need military protection...). And the Con budget which indeed attacks pay equity & environmental reviews and does little to improve EI to help the unemployed and stimulate countercyclical demand? We're in favour. Have I forgotten anything?
What next, imitate the Canadian conservatives by changing our name to something less controversial, like the Conservative Liberal Party? I mean, if we're Blue-Lite, why not go all the way, eh?
To review: We're now in bed with Pablo & his nationalist friends. And NF&L MPs can ignore 3-line whip votes to appease provincial sensitivities. And the Oil Sands are A-OK. And we're happy to stay in Afghanistan as long as the USA wants us there (oh, it'll become "humanitarian work" that happens to need military protection...). And the Con budget which indeed attacks pay equity & environmental reviews and does little to improve EI to help the unemployed and stimulate countercyclical demand? We're in favour. Have I forgotten anything?
What next, imitate the Canadian conservatives by changing our name to something less controversial, like the Conservative Liberal Party? I mean, if we're Blue-Lite, why not go all the way, eh?


13 Comments:
At 7:43 PM,
wilson said…
Iffy wants to :
“earn back the trust of Canadian farmers and farm families.”
Guess his next move is to kill the gun registry and dismantle the CWB.
Gee, do you think he would go so far as to ...nah
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090225.wPOLignatieff0225/BNStory/politics/home
At 8:09 PM,
The Mound of Sound said…
After tilting Liberal policy on its head on Gaza, our neo-conservative interim Liberal leader does this.
Ignatieff is quite happy to use the smokescreen of technological fixes for the Tar Sands in order to pander for votes. He knows, unless he's a total dolt, that there is no technological fix that's proven, viable and remotely timely.
The Stelmach government's boastful target for sequestration sounds good until you realize it's just a small fraction of Tar Sands emissions.
The fact is the technology is not proven, certainly not on the scale that would be needed for the Tar Sands. Worse, it's not viable. A 2008 study by EnviroCan found that the sequestration processes (capture, liquification, transfer, sequestration, monitoring) emits as much CO2 as the sequestration buries. Think about that. Then there's the cost and who'll pay for it and the other problems associated with sequestration. So, it's not viable.
Then there's the inevitable time lag for getting these projects implimented. Experience shows it's a generational process - 20 years minimum IF the technology was proven and viable today.
I think Mr. Ignatieff is disgracing the LPC. That said you'll still find a coterie of devout defenders who wouldn't balk on Iggy if he was caught buggering the bursar.
At 8:18 PM,
Eugene Forsey Liberal said…
Mos: You really shouldn't refer to Steve V. that way in your conclusion. I'am shocked, shocked I say!, by your salty language:)
Wilson: Shurely not...
At 8:36 PM,
SteelCityGrit said…
You're quite right about this - the oil sands bit is deeply disturbing.
I'm endlessly bothered by the inane commentary about Liberals' past arrogance vis-a-vis the West. Of course it would be nice if we were more competitive west of Ontario. And yes, it would be good for national unity. But there are, now as always, substantive values issues that alienate us to some degree from the greater part of the West.
At 8:38 PM,
The Mound of Sound said…
Actually, EFL, Steve V isn't supporting Iggy on this one. In fact it seems this could be the camel straw for Steve. He thinks Ignatieff has finally gone too far.
Cheers
At 9:42 PM,
Anonymous said…
Mr.Ignatieff has just lost my support as a future PM. I don't want Canada to be a "world leader" in environmental destruction. What a disappointment this is.
At 9:53 PM,
Oemissions said…
You guys replaced Dion for this?
At 10:27 PM,
John Larocque said…
Hmm.... "Conservative Liberal", or if you prefer "Liberal Conservative"
Been there, done that. Before Conservative or Alliance or Reform, and long before Progressive Conservative there was this party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal-
Conservative_Party
"Liberal-Conservative" was coined as a coalition name for moderate Reform members who joined with John A. MacDonald's Conservatives in the 1850s. Take that, Preston Manning.
The Left-wing Reformers and the Clear Grits begat another electoral coalition... Thus paving the way for such later concepts as Liberal/Progressive in the 1930s and Liberal/Labour in the 1950s.
At 10:37 PM,
Anonymous said…
You guys replaced Dion for this?
He was "appointed".... not voted in...
At 12:29 AM,
Anonymous said…
This position on the oilsands is indefensible. Where is Rae? At least we know where he stands.
At 5:24 AM,
Anonymous said…
Unfortunately, Ignatieff is doing nothing different than what he did in 2006 during the leadership campaign.
1. Saying things that should not be said.
2. Forcing folks to question his appropriateness as the Liberal leader.
Ignatieff LOST, more than any of the other leadership candidates, the 2006 leadership campaign.
Ignatieff, if he is not more careful, will lose the seats the Conservatives covet for their majority.
At 1:17 PM,
Eugene Forsey Liberal said…
So, reviewing the comments, I guess we can say that Liberals' are decidedly NOT down with this.
Mr. Larocque, nice catch. I was not unaware of that history and wondered if any might notice. Impressive. So who's Baldwin, Macdonald & Cartier? Iggy, Harper & Charest (a "true" Liberal-Conservative), perhaps?
At 12:43 AM,
gymbo said…
Redneck Jimmy says It's time to say goodbye you eastern clowns raped us once now it's time to joint the USA Washington would treat us 10x better than eastern Canada.
Post a Comment
<< Home