Gerard Kennedy Is My Kind Of Guy
One should always, ALWAYS, applaud honesty, integrity & coherence in politics. Or else it's all meaningless. And then, Harper is right, prorogation means nothing, overthrowing parliament means nothing, climate change doesn't exist, no-one cares, shut up, stay home, and have another beer while watching Cherry on TV...No! NON! Life does have meaning, politics are meaningful, & we can make the world a better place. If we want a better politics, a better Canada, a better world, it starts with us, the citizenry, and our willingness & responsibility to approve truth & goodness, & condemn lies, superficiality & evil. If we want a better politics, we must encourage our politicians to act like Kennedy, & be honest. This goes for people of all political persuasions, conservative, socialist, whatever, your representatives should be idealists who speak the truth as they they see it, you should require it of them, both their ideals & their honesty. Otherwise we will never have healthy mature debate, because cheating & lying makes it impossible, and just one cheater means everyone else has to as well, or abandon all hope of winning/policy change.
I completely agree with Kennedy's specific point, and a larger one can and should be made: what kind of Canada do we want? Therefore, what is the best way to pay for it? What mix of taxation, set at what rates, is fairest & most efficient to achieve our goals? I think no Canadian should ever live in fear for their material well-being. Anxiety, that is inevitable. But from birth till death, every Canadian should be given the opportunity to make the most of his life, and the courage to do so, knowing that there's a real, working safety net there to catch him if he fails, keep him in good shape, and help him get back up on his feet. This allows every Canadian to maximise their "value-added" in economic terms (no-one should feel they have to trade down because of fear of short-term, bad for them, bad for all of us: less happy, less productive, less revenue increasing situation)
"Danish Solution", though caricature, is right. The market is given all the freedom to follow its natural inclinations, and the State makes sure all are well and confident enough of material circumstances at all times to try to improve themselves and achieve their greatest happiness, at all times. Render unto the Market what is the Market's, and render unto the Public Sector what is Public.
But right now, maybe best to keep focus on democracy, eh? First things first. First, reestablish Democracy, pre-condition to all else, then fix Mixed Economy.
I completely agree with Kennedy's specific point, and a larger one can and should be made: what kind of Canada do we want? Therefore, what is the best way to pay for it? What mix of taxation, set at what rates, is fairest & most efficient to achieve our goals? I think no Canadian should ever live in fear for their material well-being. Anxiety, that is inevitable. But from birth till death, every Canadian should be given the opportunity to make the most of his life, and the courage to do so, knowing that there's a real, working safety net there to catch him if he fails, keep him in good shape, and help him get back up on his feet. This allows every Canadian to maximise their "value-added" in economic terms (no-one should feel they have to trade down because of fear of short-term, bad for them, bad for all of us: less happy, less productive, less revenue increasing situation)
"Danish Solution", though caricature, is right. The market is given all the freedom to follow its natural inclinations, and the State makes sure all are well and confident enough of material circumstances at all times to try to improve themselves and achieve their greatest happiness, at all times. Render unto the Market what is the Market's, and render unto the Public Sector what is Public.
But right now, maybe best to keep focus on democracy, eh? First things first. First, reestablish Democracy, pre-condition to all else, then fix Mixed Economy.


7 Comments:
At 6:16 PM,
Liberal Justice said…
Gerald Kennedy stepped out of line. It is Michael Ignatieff's job to speak to matters of these issues. Kennedy was not elected our leader! Ignatieff has said no to a GST tax increase and that ends the debate.
At 7:09 PM,
Anonymous said…
When there is no other out someone has to take the lead and waiting for a nervous Nelly to finally fumble his way into thinking for himself and finding backbone enough to rest the reigns from twits, is not the answer.
Good on Gerard.
I never did like one voice parties.
foottothefire
At 9:40 PM,
Anonymous said…
The Liberals do not have any moral authority on the GST issue because they allowed the cuts to take place by not bothering to vote.Some Liberals including Iggy have said they have no intentions of increasing the GST. But then again its only Friday.
At 11:32 PM,
Eugene Forsey Liberal said…
Some Lib-haters on edge these days, eh?
At 9:42 AM,
laura k said…
Kennedy is an excellent man. He is the sponsor of Bill C-440, the private member's bill that would allow US Iraq War resisters to stay in Canada. Parliament has already voted for this twice, in two separate (non-binding) motions, all three opposition parties coming together as one - and the Harper Govt ignored both. C-440 would give those motions the weight of law.
More info on C-440 here.
I hope you'll forgive this slightly off-topic comment, but Gerard Kennedy is coming through for justice and for Canadian values with this bill, and I want to spread the word.
Thanks!
At 2:45 PM,
Chrystal Ocean said…
Liberal Justice appears to prefer his party leader emulate Stephen Harper: that Ignatieff muzzle Liberal MPs. Do that and it's one more comparison between Ignatieff and Harper that does the former no favour.
At 10:25 PM,
Eugene Forsey Liberal said…
L-Girl & Chrystal Ocean both make excellent points.
Post a Comment
<< Home